Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Updated by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PL8 was introduced 3 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-PL8 scores versus the TG-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | June 2013 | More recent by 40 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 610k | Clearer screen (+427k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-2 iHS | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PL8 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL8 offers exterior measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL8 against the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL8 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-PL8 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 350 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $500 | $380 |