Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
- Updated by Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-4, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively close but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL8 was introduced 18 months later than the TG-4 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL8 matches up vs the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-4
E-PL8 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | April 2015 | Fresher by 18 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-4 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-4
E-PL8 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL8 offers outside dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48bc2/48bc2c71e9ccc953b51bcab10f27c4ecb2ebdf05" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and TG-4 is 86 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ff17/2ff17a5ffe3d4ade645355e8261ef8d6d0c61d66" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and TG-4.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL8 features the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF easier. The fresher E-PL8 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11e45/11e4532bc09fcb0bb77f84f6ffa0acc3c0e2b60e" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2d5f/e2d5fda3b2af8082f278245e5de71b9a21186ea1" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2015-04-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $379 |