Clicky

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
76
Overall
62
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very similar but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-PL8 was revealed 5 years after the VR-320 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL8 scores versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus VR-320

 E-PL8 VR-320 
LaunchedSeptember 2016July 2011Newer by 63 months
Manually focus More exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-PL8

 VR-320 E-PL8 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-320

 E-PL8 VR-320 
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 features external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-PL8 versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the VR-320.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and VR-320 is 86 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL8 and VR-320.

All in all, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL8 will offer greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-PL8 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Portrait photography info
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography info
72
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW files
33
decent MP (14MP)
includes face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
84
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
boasts focus via touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PL8
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL8
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
71
boasts focus via touch
MP count good (16MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
70
lighter than competitors (158g)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
80
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
35
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of mic port
32
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus PEN E-PL8Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL8 Olympus VR-320
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-09-19 2011-07-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 357 grams (0.79 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $500 $179