Clicky

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
86
Imaging
55
Features
76
Overall
63
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL9
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Let's look closer at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-330, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-PL8 was introduced 5 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-PL8 grades against the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-PL8 VR-330 
RevealedSeptember 2016February 2011Newer by 69 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1037k460kCrisper display (+577k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-PL8

 VR-330 E-PL8 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-330

 E-PL8 VR-330 
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 features outside dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL8 versus the VR-330.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and VR-330 is 86 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and VR-330.

Clearly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will provide more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL8 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Portrait photography camera
73
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
exports RAW files
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
84
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography info
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography advice
72
boasts focus by touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
80
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
42
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL8
Vlogging with Olympus VR-330
36
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
32
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus PEN E-PL8Olympus VR-330
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL8 Olympus VR-330
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2016-09-19 2011-02-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 357 gr (0.79 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $500 $220