Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-330, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL8 was introduced 5 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-PL8 grades against the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus VR-330
E-PL8 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 69 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-PL8
VR-330 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-330
E-PL8 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 features outside dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL8 versus the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b0d4/9b0d48f51b65b0cd0fbccc478b67fa829fdf52a7" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and VR-330 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b902/4b902d568eaca3f2bd31fb53cc0ed297b2f3ceb2" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and VR-330.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will provide more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL8 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88be7/88be7ec1f4959a8c0daa5a850fed2fe9b7aa92b0" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a5fa/5a5fa2f01190eab7607c4b05d14eb944b8905f4e" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus VR-330 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $500 | $220 |