Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb52/1cb52a0c40114d28dcc51a80a6a5ed47ea5f756b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL8 versus Panasonic FX700, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the FX700 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL8 was brought out 6 years later than the FX700 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-PL8 grades versus the FX700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Panasonic FX700
E-PL8 | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 76 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-PL8
FX700 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic FX700
E-PL8 | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 offers outer dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Panasonic FX700 has specifications of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Panasonic FX700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PL8 and the FX700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5ff8/a5ff85e5423f27aff82e2d7399976580d4a1e68b" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and FX700 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0f59/d0f5955e25421fc467bb6499ca77804b510fffb5" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL8 and FX700.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL8 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL8 will produce greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent E-PL8 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889b4/889b4b7ab168af2e9a3967d7e2994c2d2d06b975" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8902/a8902131704e5c783591cced48a2a704576c5ce8" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.40 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 176g (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $500 | $399 |