Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14531/14531b22504a4959f06ffa69a9ec4d9107943879" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front"
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Successor is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic FZ200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL8 was revealed 4 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL8 matches up against the FZ200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-PL8 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2012 | More recent by 51 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-PL8
FZ200 | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic FZ200
E-PL8 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL8 has outside measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the FZ200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/239ac/239ac3d04ebda4b2eb30899ff0fba2eedf4e6d21" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and FZ200 is 86 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d3a4/8d3a401255288cf359e4997d67ba6f7864679714" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL8 and FZ200.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL8 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL8 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a2c/c0a2cc4a229dc71241bbc347a41eab2b73d7b44c" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20e0d/20e0dd1027fb688dfb3494e949637f32fe047869" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357g (0.79 lb) | 588g (1.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 540 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $500 | $499 |