Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Introduced October 2009
- Refreshed by Panasonic GF2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL8 versus Panasonic GF1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and GF1 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL8 was released 7 years after the GF1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-PL8 scores versus the GF1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Panasonic GF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Panasonic GF1
| E-PL8 | GF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2016 |  | October 2009 | More modern by 85 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus E-PL8
| GF1 | E-PL8 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic GF1
| E-PL8 | GF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 provides physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Panasonic GF1 has dimensions of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL8 versus Panasonic GF1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 against the GF1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and GF1 is 86 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and GF1.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus E-PL8 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer E-PL8 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2009-10-14 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 385 grams (0.85 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 513 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 380 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/MMC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $500 | $400 |