Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Successor is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the WG-2 (16MP) is very similar but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL8 was brought out 4 years later than the WG-2 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PL8 matches up vs the WG-2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Pentax WG-2
E-PL8 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 57 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-PL8
WG-2 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Pentax WG-2
E-PL8 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 has physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ad74/5ad748f10b9698a608f9a118e6b451514eb7e515" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and WG-2 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f160/8f16098393d29a6dc2f38eca4a12c9482248f0c0" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The photograph here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and WG-2.
All in all, each of these cameras have got the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL8 includes the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh easier. The more recent E-PL8 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/421e8/421e8e9ad3edffa14793f7cf01ee5cbf36397bcd" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d0f9/3d0f9660d80e6853d6623c544e3f91fde6598357" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lbs) | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 260 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $500 | $350 |