Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL8 and Pentax Q-S1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL8 was announced 2 years later than the Q-S1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL8 grades vs the Q-S1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Pentax Q-S1
E-PL8 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | August 2014 | Fresher by 26 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-PL8
Q-S1 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Pentax Q-S1
E-PL8 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 has exterior measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL8 and Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 compared to the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b54e6/b54e6dda782c8b283556d77e4b593c178a94a5aa" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and Q-S1 is 86 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2657d/2657d752e860c7779184fad56bde8a3fab407def" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL8 and Q-S1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL8 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-PL8 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ea36/4ea362bb9cab4950acfa7b27edd55e88f6f95b05" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7232/c72321191e1ce6a8945e1e728da6000df3941c68" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Available lenses | 107 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lb) | 203 grams (0.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 250 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $500 | $250 |