Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL7
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-PL8 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly close but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL8 was manufactured 4 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-PL8 scores vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PL8 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2012 | More recent by 57 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-PL8
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PL8 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL8 has got outer dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL8 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL8 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL8 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 86 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-PL8 uses the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult. The more recent E-PL8 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 550 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 400 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $500 | $871 |