Clicky

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
76
Overall
62
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sigma. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-PL8 was announced 7 months after the Quattro and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-PL8 grades against the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Sigma Quattro

 E-PL8 Quattro 
RevealedSeptember 2016February 2016More modern by 7 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-PL8

 Quattro E-PL8 
Screen resolution1620k1037kClearer screen (+583k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Sigma Quattro

 E-PL8 Quattro 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL8 comes with physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL8 versus the Quattro.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and Quattro is 86 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and Quattro.

As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma Quattro will give greater detail with its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 should have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
72
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
81
manual focus
great megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 Street photography info
Sigma Quattro Street photography info
84
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (625g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PL8
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
lacks phase detect autofocus
70
great megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL8
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
71
includes focus by touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
55
weather proof
great megapixels (29MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (625 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL8
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro
80
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
72
manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
great megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL8 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma Quattro as a Vlogging camera
35
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic socket
22
has face detection focus
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video ( pxls)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (625g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL8 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL8 and Sigma Quattro
 Olympus PEN E-PL8Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL8 Sigma sd Quattro
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2016-09-19 2016-02-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Amount of lenses 107 76
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 1,620 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 357g (0.79 pounds) 625g (1.38 pounds)
Dimensions 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $500 $738