Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL7
- Successor is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Refreshed by Sony a5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-PL8 versus Sony NEX-3N, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PL8 was launched 3 years after the NEX-3N which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-PL8 grades versus the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Sony NEX-3N
| E-PL8 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2016 |  | February 2013 | Newer by 44 months |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-PL8
| NEX-3N | E-PL8 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Sony NEX-3N
| E-PL8 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL8 provides external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL8 versus Sony NEX-3N in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-PL8 against the NEX-3N.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL8 and NEX-3N is 86 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 offers the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult. The newer E-PL8 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-PL8 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lbs) | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 480 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $500 | $399 |