Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus SP-590 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PL9 was introduced 9 years later than the SP-590 UZ and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-PL9 scores against the SP-590 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus SP-590 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-PL9 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | January 2009 | Fresher by 111 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus E-PL9
SP-590 UZ | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-PL9 | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 provides outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus SP-590 UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus SP-590 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 vs the SP-590 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and SP-590 UZ is 85 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The photograph here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and SP-590 UZ.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer you greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-590 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-590 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 8.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $249 |