Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL9 was launched 8 years after the SP-600 UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-PL9 scores versus the SP-600 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-PL9 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | February 2010 | Newer by 98 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-PL9
SP-600 UZ | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-PL9 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys outside measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the SP-600 UZ.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and SP-600 UZ is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and SP-600 UZ.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 pounds) | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $599 | $189 |