Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Released July 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL9 was brought out 6 years later than the SP-810 UZ and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PL9 scores vs the SP-810 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus SP-810 UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-PL9 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 80 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-PL9
SP-810 UZ | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-PL9 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 has got outside measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-810 UZ has proportions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 and the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23e99/23e99cd1d44c4a849a79dd5e2939e3f65076c6bf" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and SP-810 UZ is 85 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/327f3/327f3f0f3e84ab2f930fb2e19f2d19c6f668335d" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and SP-810 UZ.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will resolve more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17b09/17b0968963cd7deb0140ef7d1a9082520d44e86d" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9efff/9efff8472aa5bcb45d73273a3389d941837fcee5" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 413g (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $280 |