Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PL9 was introduced 5 years after the SP-820UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL9 scores versus the SP-820UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
E-PL9 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | August 2012 | More modern by 67 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-PL9
SP-820UZ | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus SP-820UZ
E-PL9 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 has outside dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 against the SP-820UZ.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and SP-820UZ is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and SP-820UZ.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer you more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.4-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 15.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 485 grams (1.07 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $299 |