Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
![Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9/Olympus-E-PL9-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SP-820UZ/Olympus-SP-820UZ-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The E-PL9 was introduced 5 years after the SP-820UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL9 scores versus the SP-820UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
E-PL9 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 67 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-PL9
SP-820UZ | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus SP-820UZ
E-PL9 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 has outside dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 against the SP-820UZ.
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SP-820UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and SP-820UZ is 85 and 69 respectively.
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SP-820UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and SP-820UZ.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer you more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SP-820UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SP-820UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.4-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 15.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 485 grams (1.07 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $299 |