Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL9 was brought out 8 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL9 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL9 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 99 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-PL9
Tough-3000 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL9 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 offers outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 versus the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4407/b4407253e04bc628cba85bbff0de3589db6206af" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and Tough-3000 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22759/22759bdc553f51921ffee5279be902866debc74b" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and Tough-3000.
All in all, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will result in greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10f0a/10f0ada064bfc1bc4e27153cefcc2fad79c52093" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22997/22997e107b28f85424a8ed60dc44bb5a6144243f" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $0 |