Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
![Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9/Olympus-E-PL9-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6020/Olympus-6020-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus 6020, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The E-PL9 was revealed 8 years after the 6020 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-PL9 grades versus the 6020 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus 6020
E-PL9 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 98 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-PL9
6020 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus 6020
E-PL9 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-PL9 against the 6020.
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6020-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and 6020 is 85 and 95 respectively.
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6020-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and 6020.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will give you more detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6020-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL9-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6020-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 122g (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $279 |