Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-PL9 was announced 5 years later than the XZ-10 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-PL9 grades versus the XZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus XZ-10
E-PL9 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | January 2013 | More recent by 62 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-PL9
XZ-10 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus XZ-10
E-PL9 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 offers external dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the XZ-10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and XZ-10 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and XZ-10.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will render extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2018-02-08 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 221g (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 240 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $599 | $428 |