Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL9 was unveiled 6 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PL9 grades against the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL9 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | February 2012 | More recent by 74 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1030k | Clearer display (+10k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-PL9
TG-820 iHS | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL9 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 features physical measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 and the TG-820 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and TG-820 iHS is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,030k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 220 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $500 |