Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL9 was announced 6 years later than the VG-160 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL9 scores vs the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus VG-160
E-PL9 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 75 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-PL9
VG-160 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VG-160
E-PL9 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 has got exterior dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-PL9 versus the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e62ca/e62ca484aef1d1d946e112528715db69d137a0d4" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and VG-160 is 85 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d86c/4d86cad8450a383ad84d030abe8e8ba6f2a8f569" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and VG-160.
As you can see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will deliver extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 should have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af86/7af86550e9f2688995201e188dc55f9633b12b56" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1b3d/a1b3decaed0818f55773ff98defb7b281ec9dcd8" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VG-160 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 165 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $90 |