Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL9 was brought out 6 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-PL9 scores versus the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus VR-320
E-PL9 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 80 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-PL9
VR-320 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-320
E-PL9 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 has got outside dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL9 versus the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d04d1/d04d1bf993907639ef44d0a3cd90d2c345d0dbdc" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and VR-320 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a7a2/1a7a26070827fba1eb3ee01cac37753dbe14ea92" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and VR-320.
All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cf29/9cf29a4d042372c8c56f3564549a7db134334ded" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd12b/fd12bc94b04892b8605874f810143de3ee7133e7" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $179 |