Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Revealed February 2018
  • Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-PL9 was brought out 6 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-PL9 scores versus the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus VR-320

 E-PL9 VR-320 
IntroducedFebruary 2018July 2011Fresher by 80 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-PL9

 VR-320 E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-320

 E-PL9 VR-320 
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 has got outside dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL9 versus the VR-320.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and VR-320 is 85 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and VR-320.

All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography highlights
73
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Street photography details
Olympus VR-320 Street photography details
84
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts touch to focus
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
69
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
has no phase detect AF
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
77
has bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL9
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
42
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL9
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
35
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
missing external mic port
32
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL9 Olympus VR-320
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2018-02-08 2011-07-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Max boosted ISO 25600 -
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 380g (0.84 lb) 158g (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $599 $179