Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-330, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PL9 was launched 7 years later than the VR-330 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-PL9 matches up against the VR-330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-PL9 VR-330 
AnnouncedFebruary 2018February 2011Fresher by 86 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-PL9

 VR-330 E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-330

 E-PL9 VR-330 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 provides exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL9 versus the VR-330.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and VR-330 is 85 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and VR-330.

Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Portrait photography camera
73
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
33
decent MP (14MP)
features face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Street photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Street photography factors
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
boasts touch focus
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
69
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography information
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography information
77
supports bluetooth
boasts touch focus
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
does not offer selfie friendly display
70
lighter than others (158g)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography information
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography information
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
42
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging information
35
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does not offer selfie friendly display
missing external microphone socket
32
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than others (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Olympus VR-330
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL9 Olympus VR-330
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2018-02-08 2011-02-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 25600 -
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 380 grams (0.84 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $599 $220