Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-330, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL9 was launched 7 years later than the VR-330 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-PL9 matches up against the VR-330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus VR-330
E-PL9 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | February 2011 | Fresher by 86 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-PL9
VR-330 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-330
E-PL9 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 provides exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 and Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL9 versus the VR-330.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and VR-330 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and VR-330.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Olympus VR-330 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $599 | $220 |