Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FS12, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and FS12 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL9 was released 8 years after the FS12 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-PL9 grades vs the FS12 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FS12
| E-PL9 | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 108 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-PL9
| FS12 | E-PL9 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FS12
| E-PL9 | FS12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 offers outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has sizing of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FS12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 vs the FS12.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and FS12 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and FS12.
Plainly, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2009-04-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 380g (0.84 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $228 |