Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14843/14843fe54ad829f1dcedf3904c1935557340eb3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FS15, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and FS15 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FS15 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL9 was introduced 9 years later than the FS15 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PL9 grades against the FS15 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FS15
E-PL9 | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 111 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus E-PL9
FS15 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FS15
E-PL9 | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 offers physical measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Panasonic FS15 has proportions of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FS15 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 against the FS15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cad08/cad08bc4156fc74deac2c78db434337ca6f6361b" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and FS15 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c827/5c8274240b01bdce3ed5c706dee796b1c43874ca" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and FS15.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer you extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26bd1/26bd1511281bc3447566be62eea4d2c781d390de" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da300/da300c04201cb5a33e60f3b8356907cafc6c0b86" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2009-01-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lb) | 136g (0.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | $180 |