Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Revealed February 2018
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Revealed July 2012
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Refreshed by Panasonic FZ300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FZ200, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-PL9 was manufactured 5 years later than the FZ200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-PL9 scores against the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-PL9 FZ200 
RevealedFebruary 2018July 2012More recent by 68 months
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-PL9

 FZ200 E-PL9 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-PL9 FZ200 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 offers physical dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 and the FZ200.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and FZ200 is 85 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and FZ200.

Plainly, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will give you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Portrait photography camera
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW files
48
manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
supports touch focus
57
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (588 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PL9
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ200
69
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
lack of phase detect auto focus
46
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery life (540 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL9
Travel photography with Panasonic FZ200
77
supports bluetooth
supports touch focus
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
55
great battery life (540 CIPA)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (588g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography advice
80
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
48
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (540 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Vlogging details
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging details
35
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
63
reasonably wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic socket
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than average in class (588 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus PEN E-PL9 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2018-02-08 2012-07-18
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 380 grams (0.84 lbs) 588 grams (1.30 lbs)
Dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 540 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $599 $499