Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Older Model is Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is very close but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL9 was announced 17 months later than the FZ2500 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-PL9 matches up versus the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-PL9 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | Fresher by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-PL9
FZ2500 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-PL9 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | Exact same display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 provides physical dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 vs the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cc43/0cc43e324bbff68ee610adb51086d9409b12e09e" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and FZ2500 is 85 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6b1c/f6b1cc873c2cdd77129712d7c31af1aa7b12690e" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and FZ2500.
As you can see, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8ca2/f8ca2b9d8f9a12e84326fd91de94d5d00b1ae55a" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/112f7/112f74afac8fd46e9ccfe17d1cf80cfcb046b4a4" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lb) | 915 grams (2.02 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $599 | $998 |