Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8c8/ba8c84321243bf7db389cbc1d93f9ebc5fe9c022" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 front"
68 Imaging
35 Features
45 Overall
39
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 498g - 120 x 80 x 92mm
- Launched July 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ47, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and FZ47 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FZ47 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL9 was introduced 6 years later than the FZ47 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ47 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-PL9 scores versus the FZ47 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic FZ47 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FZ47
E-PL9 | FZ47 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 80 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ47 over the Olympus E-PL9
FZ47 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ47
E-PL9 | FZ47 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 has got outside measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ47 has sizing of 120mm x 80mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") with a weight of 498 grams (1.10 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ47 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the FZ47.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b9c0/2b9c0745305d5727a84694a4c0855f04711ec77c" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and FZ47 is 85 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4fab/c4fabd48d8e95d12fe9b141a59625945837cc48a" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and FZ47.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5c09/e5c09bf37c7a52c8f753e243409cf2f05de8f505" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fda1/9fda124009355dea7f9c7ce7ba2cc6c8c96da3b2" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ47 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ48 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2011-07-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 9.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 498 gr (1.10 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 120 x 80 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $599 | $379 |