Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
63 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 606g - 130 x 97 x 118mm
- Announced July 2013
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FZ70, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the FZ70 (16MP) is very similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and FZ70 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL9 was introduced 4 years after the FZ70 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-PL9 grades vs the FZ70 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic FZ70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic FZ70
E-PL9 | FZ70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | July 2013 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ70 over the Olympus E-PL9
FZ70 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic FZ70
E-PL9 | FZ70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 features physical dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ70 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") having a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic FZ70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-PL9 against the FZ70.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and FZ70 is 85 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and FZ70.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with the identical resolution but different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 provides the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF easier. The more modern E-PL9 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic FZ70 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2013-07-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (50i/60i, 25p/30p), 1280 x 720p (50p/60p or 25p/30p), 640 x 480 (25p/30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 606 grams (1.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 130 x 97 x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 41 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 171 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 400 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $599 | $300 |