Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3e2/ab3e2b95d505b4b0ff0bfe0dc0d284b98f4a2d41" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Introduced October 2009
- Refreshed by Panasonic GF2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and GF1 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL9 was announced 8 years after the GF1 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-PL9 scores against the GF1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic GF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic GF1
E-PL9 | GF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | October 2009 | More modern by 102 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus E-PL9
GF1 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic GF1
E-PL9 | GF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with exterior dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF1 has specifications of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the GF1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f74/65f74ad1335a64ebdd7d3f98df723271f5703dc7" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and GF1 is 85 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10ce8/10ce860ba701bf0a641533c69715366cc2768ac7" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The pic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and GF1.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus E-PL9 to provide more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55544/555449b9753d045dd126eac36526e1649a91306e" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e9f/a7e9fce47876c34a124fd581d1a9efbcda054a08" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2009-10-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine HD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 385 gr (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 513 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 380 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $599 | $400 |