Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67164/67164dd2c0a4166f60840c2f5aeb5d3444f381e6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Released November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic LF1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and LF1 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and LF1 (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL9 was introduced 4 years later than the LF1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic LF1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-PL9 grades versus the LF1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic LF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic LF1
E-PL9 | LF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 52 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Olympus E-PL9
LF1 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic LF1
E-PL9 | LF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 has exterior dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LF1 has sizing of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic LF1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL9 versus the LF1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32bf0/32bf049c5448616eec422f451350aefed9fe56c4" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and LF1 is 85 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/018d0/018d03799be7e6c7c91f4bf5b9ceb6c016d51197" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and LF1.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will give more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04bc5/04bc5ee6881836b7ae4809786e813c292d61f4ac" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9cec/d9cecb7524d74219658485851da89b518d191555" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic LF1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2018-02-08 | 2013-11-26 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 7.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 pounds) | 192g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 211 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 250 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $599 | $500 |