Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2fa3/f2fa3d67cbb32681bfe51b0d7c80eb07478300a0" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 131g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the SZ1 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and SZ1 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL9 was manufactured 6 years after the SZ1 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic SZ1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-PL9 grades against the SZ1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic SZ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic SZ1
E-PL9 | SZ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 75 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ1 over the Olympus E-PL9
SZ1 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic SZ1
E-PL9 | SZ1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 has outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ1 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 131 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL9 against the SZ1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d0df/6d0dfa2e0ede4538f726c36c705bd79716747e18" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and SZ1 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4c04/c4c04b0e533bb72d284cba911d6f65ce9c3664db" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The picture here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and SZ1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The E-PL9 contains the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier. The fresher E-PL9 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85660/85660a063d568be5b0bfdd0be7f2973db46aa2d8" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e63/a4e6331ea4c4f65c8f4f15296c96dcbabe01fec3" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic SZ1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lbs) | 131 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 250 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $599 | $179 |