Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a81b/6a81b74be2fc2f5b005db0ba199900d1cad3b423" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL9 was brought out 8 years later than the ZS1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-PL9 grades vs the ZS1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS1
E-PL9 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 107 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-PL9
ZS1 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS1
E-PL9 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with external measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS1 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL9 vs the ZS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a624/7a624ab4079d33aaa8378edab70248d2c855e204" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and ZS1 is 85 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e42a/3e42a7567f509d969c7f69bb7ca02d4018c672f7" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the difference in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The photograph below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and ZS1.
To sum up, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will show more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d17c/4d17c05a620d65d5c5796e65b3b13df424b31fda" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2d7c/a2d7cbd8ab03c26a30ea78dd5a90e3876397bf6f" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 pounds) | 229 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $599 | $0 |