Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
91 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS10, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the ZS10 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS10 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL9 was released 7 years after the ZS10 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS10 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PL9 scores vs the ZS10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic ZS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS10
E-PL9 | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2011 | Newer by 86 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS10 over the Olympus E-PL9
ZS10 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS10
E-PL9 | ZS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 offers physical measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS10 has measurements of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL9 vs the ZS10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and ZS10 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The image here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and ZS10.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will render more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ20 / Lumix DMC-TZ22 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lbs) | 219 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 260 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $350 |