Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25c20/25c200bbfc081616744826f0a4654558e906b113" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front"
92 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS25
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the ZS30 (18MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS30 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL9 was revealed 5 years after the ZS30 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS30 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-PL9 grades vs the ZS30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Panasonic ZS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS30
E-PL9 | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 62 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus E-PL9
ZS30 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS30
E-PL9 | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS30 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the ZS30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37c62/37c629183df110a2cc9e26050c41d3ebb8b88521" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and ZS30 is 85 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a8c2/2a8c2a14b1db1e310291dbdbc8d8882802a44f6d" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The pic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and ZS30.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS30 will produce more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/978c8/978c882aae0b5cdbbd455db0d31e2993df0e1a2f" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1350/f13502add98ae54e088e297b349b2fc8a6fc65cd" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ40 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 pounds) | 198g (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 260 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $599 | $250 |