Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Released February 2018
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Released January 2014
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS30
  • Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-PL9 was released 4 years later than the ZS35 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PL9 scores versus the ZS35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-PL9 ZS35 
ReleasedFebruary 2018January 2014More recent by 50 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-PL9

 ZS35 E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS35

 E-PL9 ZS35 
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL9 provides outside dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 vs the ZS35.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and ZS35 is 85 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and ZS35.

To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-PL9 offers the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The younger E-PL9 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography features
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography features
73
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
37
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Street photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography factors
84
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports focus via touch
68
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (305 grams)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography information
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography information
69
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
53
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Travel photography camera
77
connects via bluetooth
supports focus via touch
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
does not feature selfie friendly screen
68
lighter than average (305 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great reach (480mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography features
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography features
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
44
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL9
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
35
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no external mic jack
34
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (305 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL9 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2018-02-08 2014-01-06
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 21
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 6.00 m
Flash settings Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 380 grams (0.84 lb) 305 grams (0.67 lb)
Dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $599 $300