Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Launched January 2015
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS45
- New Model is Panasonic ZS60
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS50, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL9 was manufactured 3 years later than the ZS50 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PL9 scores against the ZS50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Panasonic ZS50
E-PL9 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2015 | More recent by 38 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-PL9
ZS50 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Panasonic ZS50
E-PL9 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 features external dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS50 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 versus Panasonic ZS50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL9 and the ZS50.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and ZS50 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The visual below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and ZS50.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL9 will render greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2018-02-08 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 243g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $350 |