Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
59 Imaging
66 Features
84 Overall
73
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Launched April 2015
- Succeeded the Pentax K-3
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II Overview
The following is a extended review of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and K-3 II (24MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and K-3 II (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL9 was launched 2 years after the K-3 II which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-3 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PL9 grades vs the K-3 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Pentax K-3 II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Pentax K-3 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Pentax K-3 II
E-PL9 | K-3 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | April 2015 | Newer by 35 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+3k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-3 II over the Olympus E-PL9
K-3 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax K-3 II
E-PL9 | K-3 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-3 II has dimensions of 131mm x 100mm x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 versus the K-3 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and K-3 II is 85 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The image here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and K-3 II.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Pentax K-3 II will render extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-3 II Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax K-3 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax K-3 II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2018-02-08 | 2015-04-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Prime III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6016 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 27 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 8.3fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync (available with dedicated external flash) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lb) | 800 grams (1.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1106 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 720 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Retail pricing | $599 | $829 |