Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
64 Imaging
64 Features
82 Overall
71
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Pentax K-S1
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the K-S2 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and K-S2 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL9 was revealed 3 years later than the K-S2 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL9 matches up against the K-S2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Pentax K-S2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Pentax K-S2
E-PL9 | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | February 2015 | More recent by 37 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus E-PL9
K-S2 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax K-S2
E-PL9 | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-S2 has dimensions of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the K-S2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and K-S2 is 85 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The photograph here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and K-S2.
All in all, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Pentax K-S2 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax K-S2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 5.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 pounds) | 678g (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 410 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $581 |