Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Earlier Model is Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax K200D, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and K200D (10MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL9 was unveiled 9 years later than the K200D and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PL9 scores against the K200D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Pentax K200D. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Pentax K200D
E-PL9 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2008 | More recent by 115 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-PL9
K200D | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax K200D
E-PL9 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 features external dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has sizing of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax K200D in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 against the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0734/b0734f3042fd782fae672591ebf00347ba8785ee" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and K200D is 85 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de571/de5717a26ca68e267d613faecb6761918cffd081" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and K200D.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will give you extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07286/07286d51b32799581c78e693a97595b57fe47418" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/028ce/028cedcb3142dc7b3b9daa72be484442d9958f53" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax K200D |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $600 |