Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64


66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Released July 2014

Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the XG-1 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and XG-1 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.

The E-PL9 was announced 3 years later than the XG-1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-PL9 matches up against the XG-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Pentax XG-1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Pentax XG-1
E-PL9 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2014 | Fresher by 44 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Olympus E-PL9
XG-1 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Pentax XG-1
E-PL9 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 offers external measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Pentax XG-1 has sizing of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the XG-1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and XG-1 is 85 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and XG-1.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 features the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The more modern E-PL9 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax XG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Pentax XG-1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2014-07-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lbs) | 567 grams (1.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 240 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LB-060 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $599 | $599 |