Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PL9 was launched 8 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PL9 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL9 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | November 2009 | Fresher by 101 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL9
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-PL9 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 85 and 77 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-PL9 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2018-02-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lb) | 453 grams (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 320 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $566 |