Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Announced February 2018
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-PL9 was launched 8 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PL9 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL9 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
LaunchedFebruary 2018November 2009Fresher by 101 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k920kClearer display (+120k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-PL9

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-PL9 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 comes with exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 85 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-PL9 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography details
73
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
55
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Street photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography details
84
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
62
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography details
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
does not have phase detect autofocus
32
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
bad battery (320 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography information
77
connects via bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
does not offer selfie friendly display
49
flash built-in
bad battery (320 per charge)
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography information
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
46
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
bad battery (320 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Vlogging advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging advice
35
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no microphone socket
20
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL9 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL9 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2018-02-08 2009-11-10
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 25600 -
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 50mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 180s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/3200s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 380 grams (0.84 lb) 453 grams (1.00 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 320 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $599 $566