Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f7d/47f7d7b1e27877de843384ed6303648cfc08aee4" alt="Samsung HZ35W front Samsung HZ35W front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Samsung HZ35W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL9 was brought out 7 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL9 matches up vs the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Samsung HZ35W
E-PL9 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 94 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper display (+426k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-PL9
HZ35W | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Samsung HZ35W
E-PL9 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 has got outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 against the HZ35W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd4c5/cd4c56899e2e7ed979b081ed463bc1d67794ffc0" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and HZ35W is 85 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/288a6/288a6ca46d4f0fbee5aac3c3249f39994dfd5230" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will result in extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fefda/fefda1e4c6d90e6a63622ff3d044f890f4e6d49c" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55c19/55c193abca39f0f54c01f92a510c573fb4bc28d1" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Samsung HZ35W |
Alternate name | - | WB650 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-02-08 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $599 | $300 |