Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Launched February 2018
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Additionally Known as WB650
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Samsung HZ35W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-PL9 was brought out 7 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL9 matches up vs the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-PL9 HZ35W 
ReleasedFebruary 2018June 2010More recent by 94 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k614kSharper display (+426k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-PL9

 HZ35W E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Samsung HZ35W

 E-PL9 HZ35W 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 has got outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL9 against the HZ35W.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and HZ35W is 85 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and HZ35W.

To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will result in extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-PL9 will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography information
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography information
73
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
supports RAW formats
34
you can focus manually
has face detect focus
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Street photography highlights
84
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
supports touch focus
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (245g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography advice
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
42
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL9
Travel photography with Samsung HZ35W
77
supports bluetooth
supports touch focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
does not contain selfie friendly display
63
lighter than others (245g)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (360mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography details
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography details
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
43
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Vlogging camera
35
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone jack
31
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
lighter than others (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL9 Samsung HZ35W
Alternate name - WB650
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2018-02-08 2010-06-16
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 25600 -
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 380g (0.84 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $599 $300