Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and Quattro H (APS-H) offer different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL9 was announced 24 months later than the Quattro H making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-PL9 grades vs the Quattro H with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sigma Quattro H
| E-PL9 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 | February 2016 | Fresher by 24 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Olympus E-PL9
| Quattro H | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1620k | 1040k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sigma Quattro H
| E-PL9 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 has got physical measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 against the Quattro H.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and Quattro H is 85 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and Quattro H.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro H will give you greater detail with its extra 29 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-PL9 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-H |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
| Total lenses | 107 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | - |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 380 grams (0.84 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $1,134 |