Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20264/20264de4284e63bccfa8fa0af0f9d15c3b673928" alt="Sony Alpha A7c front Sony Alpha A7c front"
78 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Increase to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Launched September 2020
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and A7c (24MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and A7c (Full frame) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL9 was revealed 3 years prior to the A7c and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-PL9 grades vs the A7c with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Sony Alpha A7c. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony A7c
E-PL9 | A7c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Olympus E-PL9
A7c | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2020 | ![]() | February 2018 | Fresher by 31 months |
Screen type | Fully articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony A7c
E-PL9 | A7c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 has got exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony A7c has sizing of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") and a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-PL9 and the A7c.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5fe6/d5fe6a983fce2a6700d2582433c13c578d6f9171" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and A7c is 85 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b215f/b215f6c5471c31787a74c99c1c81c5d38ec109f0" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The visual here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and A7c.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 having a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony A7c will offer you more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-PL9 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81b97/81b97b5baa02d6d1505e1597783db543a3bb6492" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/471b2/471b2e360b065e40b859317f056b610bb345a5a0" alt="Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony A7c Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Alpha A7c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Alpha A7c |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2018-02-08 | 2020-09-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 107 | 122 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 509g (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 740 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $599 | $1,800 |