Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1

Portability
85
Imaging
56
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Revealed February 2018
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-PL9 was released 3 years after the QX1 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-PL9 scores against the QX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony QX1

 E-PL9 QX1 
AnnouncedFebruary 2018September 2014Newer by 42 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3""Bigger screen (+3")
Screen resolution1040k0kSharper screen (+1040k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-PL9

 QX1 E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony QX1

 E-PL9 QX1 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL9 and the QX1.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and QX1 is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and QX1.

As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony QX1 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography details
Sony QX1 Portrait photography details
73
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
66
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Street photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Street photography camera
84
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
includes focus by touch
69
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
provides focus by touch
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (216g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography highlights
Sony QX1 Sports photography highlights
69
silent mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
56
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good battery (440 per charge)
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography advice
Sony QX1 Travel photography advice
77
has bluetooth
includes focus by touch
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
good battery (440 shots)
provides focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (216g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography details
Sony QX1 Landscape photography details
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
64
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
good battery (440 CIPA)
tiny screen ( inches)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Vlogging info
Sony QX1 Vlogging info
35
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic port
32
screen is touchscreen
features face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition (216g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Sony QX1
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-PL9 Sony Alpha QX1
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Lens-style
Revealed 2018-02-08 2014-09-03
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 6400 16000
Maximum boosted ISO 25600 -
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.6
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" -
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 380g (0.84 lb) 216g (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 440 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $599 $500