Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Announced February 2013
- Older Model is Sony HX200V
- New Model is Sony HX400V
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony HX300, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is relatively close but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL9 was manufactured 5 years later than the HX300 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-PL9 matches up vs the HX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony HX300
E-PL9 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | February 2013 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Clearer screen (+119k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-PL9
HX300 | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony HX300
E-PL9 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 provides physical dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL9 versus the HX300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL9 and HX300 is 85 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The visual below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and HX300.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL9 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sony HX300 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 623 gr (1.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $599 | $339 |