Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III
85 Imaging
56 Features
78 Overall
64
53 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Announced March 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
- Renewed by Sony RX10 IV
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony RX10 III, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-PL9 (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is very similar but the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") have different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL9 was manufactured 23 months later than the RX10 III making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-PL9 matches up against the RX10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony RX10 III
E-PL9 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | March 2016 | More recent by 23 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-PL9
RX10 III | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Clearer display (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony RX10 III
E-PL9 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL9 features outer measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL9 compared to the RX10 III.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and RX10 III is 85 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL9 and RX10 III.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Sony RX10 III will deliver more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-PL9 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2018-02-08 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380g (0.84 lbs) | 1051g (2.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 420 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $1,398 |