Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000
85 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PL9 was introduced 8 years after the S2000 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PL9 scores versus the S2000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony S2000
| E-PL9 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 | January 2010 | Newer by 99 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-PL9
| S2000 | E-PL9 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony S2000
| E-PL9 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL9 provides exterior measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL9 versus the S2000.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL9 and S2000 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL9 and S2000.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL9 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will offer more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2018-02-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $599 | $225 |