Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900
85 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony T900, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL9 was announced 9 years later than the T900 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-PL9 scores versus the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Sony T900
| E-PL9 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 | February 2009 | More recent by 110 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 922k | Clearer screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-PL9
| T900 | E-PL9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony T900
| E-PL9 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL9 enjoys external dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL9 and Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL9 versus the T900.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and T900 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL9 and T900.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL9 will give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer E-PL9 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus E-PL9 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2018-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $599 | $300 |